Home › Case Studies › PL-GDN-001 — Gdańsk P1 Candidate
Header image for PL-GDN-001 — Gdańsk P1 Candidate

PL-GDN-001 — Gdańsk P1 Candidate

Case Studies·Updated 27 Jun 2026·14 min·Confidence: High

Full case study of the first P1 field process in Gdańsk.

PL-GDN-001 Gdańsk S17

Executive summary

Gdańsk produced the first complete investment process: market screening, field visits, seller communication, due diligence, financing preparation and final no-go decision.

Key takeaway. This section is designed as an operational reference, not a motivational note. Every claim should eventually map to a document, observation or calculation.

Candidate sequence

Porto was emotionally strongest but lost. Młode Miasto/ROBYG offered strategic payment timing but failed on contradictions and on-site concerns. S17 became the strongest verified candidate but exceeded safe liquidity limits.

Evidence gathered

Booking records, Otodom comparables, land register checks, seller website, NIP/KRS, notary conversation, proforma/payment flow and physical inspection notes.

Outcome

No purchase. Reason: liquidity risk and loss of financial freedom, not object failure.

Reusable lesson

A good investor does not buy every good apartment. The correct timing matters as much as the asset.

Seasonality example

MonthObserved gross revenueInterpretation
May 20242,910 PLNShoulder season
June 20244,420 PLNEarly summer
July 20246,608 PLNHigh season
August 202411,368 PLNPeak season